Aggravated Stalking Conviction Overturned On Appeal - Curry vs Florida

Wow, I was totally unaware you could even call the Police on someone who has a restraining order against you w/o risking "third party contact" ?

I have had a Nursing Board Complaint sitting here Notarized, with a witness's statement also Notarized, ready to send to the Florida Board of Nursing.
This statement advises the Nursing Board about certain  Mental Health Issues of a Nurse.
It is my belief  her Mental Health Issues can possibly effect the care of Patients, and IMHO does serve a useful and Legitimate purpose.

I have tagged this post under Chris's Story.





Curry v. Florida, 811 So.2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)


The court overturned the defendant's aggravated stalking conviction. The court held that the defendant's conduct; which consisted of making complaints about the victim to various law enforcement agencies, the cities of Stuart and Vero Beach, and the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles; was constitutionally protected and served a "legitimate purpose" within the meaning of the stalking statute.








Restraining Order Blog is not meant to harass, directly or indirectly contact, harm, imtimidate, bring any emotional distress, stalk or cyberstalk, nor intentionally slander or damage any individual in any way.
Nor is it intended to initiate any third party contact on behalf of any poster or author, or violate a current restraining order in any way. If you feel there is anything on our Restraining Order Blog that is slanderous, untrue, or illegal, please bring it to our attention. Our Restraining Order Blog Legal Staff will examine your request promptly, and any post you find offensive will be reviewed and possibly removed in a timely mannner
By at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousMarch 23, 2012 at 12:04 PM

    JUDGE ALCOTT did not make a basic good judgment even when he himself proved , im none violent in POlk county when review my case(responent) and hear petitioner's 5 wittneses say respondent wasn't VIOLENT to her, the judge asked them all the same question, did u see respondent be violent to her , he grant her injunction based on texts two or three texts that DID NOT IMPLY any violent, ON TEXTS,,,OMG IS THIS JUDGE GONNA GRANT INJUNCTIONS BASED ON IMPLIED THOUGHTS TOO. BE CAREFUL I SHOULD OF HAD AN ATTORNY ON THE FIRST HEARING!!! AND I KNEW BETTER. JUDGE ALCOTT IN POLK COUNTY MY OPINION IS NOT A GOOD JUDGE, I FEEL BAD FOR THOSE THAT WENT BEFORE ME!! THIS WAS UNJUST AND UNCESSARY RULING. AND NOT DUE PROCESS, ALSO HE TOOK THE TEXTS OUT OF CONTEXT. ON TOP OF THAT HE DID NOT READ THEM ,She just told them to him,

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

LOL, I was talking with my 40 year old Son last week about the abuse of restraining orders and orders of protection, and he said "Dad, ...