She Lied Under Oath !

I was arrested for violating a restraining order, and Aggravated Stalking.
My Bond was 200,000.00 !
At a Bond Hearing, my ex claimed she was "scared of me".
Even though I had witnesses who saw her living with me, I never got to call them in court!

My Attorney asked her "Did Chris give you a check for 5,000.00" ??
She said, "No, he did not"
Fortunately, I have a Cancelled Check SHE made out!
Because she is on Disability, she asked me to make another check out for 4,900.00, so she did not have to report this.
I have that check, with her fingerprint on it, that she cashed.
She lied, under oath, in court, to keep me in Jail!

I am attempting to press perjury charges at this moment.

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 837 PERJURY
837.021 Perjury by contradictory statements.--

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), whoever, in one or more official proceedings, willfully makes two or more material statements under oath which contradict each other, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(2) Whoever, in one or more official proceedings that relate to the prosecution of a capital felony, willfully makes two or more material statements under oath which contradict each other, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(3) In any prosecution for perjury under this section:

(a) The prosecution may proceed in a single count by setting forth the willful making of contradictory statements under oath and alleging in the alternative that one or more of them are false.

(b) The question of whether a statement was material is a question of law to be determined by the court.

(c) It is not necessary to prove which, if any, of the contradictory statements is not true.

(d) It is a defense that the accused believed each statement to be true at the time the statement was made.

(4) A person may not be prosecuted under this section for making contradictory statements in separate proceedings if the contradictory statement made in the most recent proceeding was made under a grant of immunity under s. 914.04; but such person may be prosecuted under s. 837.02 for any false statement made in that most recent proceeding, and the contradictory statements may be received against him or her upon any criminal investigation or proceeding for such perjury.

History.--s. 1, ch. 72-314; s. 56, ch. 74-383; s. 34, ch. 75-298; s. 2, ch. 85-41; s. 4, ch. 97-90; s. 1312, ch. 97-102.

Last modified: November 21, 2006

4 comments:

  1. i was wrongfully impounded by Washington State Patrol trooper Dustin Drout Badge# 433. Today 01/14/11 i had court to get impound fee back and he came out and lied Under Oath about my distance from DNR Gate which i hunt. i was at least 10 yards from gate out of way BUT he, the dirt bag that he is said i was less then 15ft from it.
    i heard about Pigs lying under oath BUT i finally experienced it personally.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Police Lie all the time, as you just found out! State Trooper Dustin Drout probably gets a kickback for every vehicle he impounds from the towing company. Towing Companies are notorious scumbags, known for towing and impounding people's vehicles for little or nothing. I wonder how many other hunters Trooper Drout has had impounded ?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a lovely venue for people who break the law to p*ss and moan about how unfair life is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank You for your comment, I just approved it. We were being spammed until I started moderating comments. We publish and approve 90 percent of all comments, no matter what side of the discussion they represent. How ELSE can someone complain about a State Trooper who had the guys vehicle impounded. People tend to believe the Police, and some of them lie! How can you beat a lying State Trooper ? You can't, so we are pleased to provide a venue for people to exercise their freedom of speech (what you call piss and moan). If you have any counter arguments, feel free to post them, and exercise your freedom of speech as well.

    ReplyDelete

LOL, I was talking with my 40 year old Son last week about the abuse of restraining orders and orders of protection, and he said "Dad, ...