How a court in the State of Virginia, could possibly grant a Civil Protection Order to protect a Man from a Woman, after he admitted in open court she had not threatened him, and did not feel he was in any danger quite frankly stinks! But, she is Black, and he is White! It sure sounds like a racist judge IMHO, to me, based upon the facts I have in this case. Unfortunately, Racism appears to be still alive and well, in this case.
Has anyone else ever encountered what appears to be blatant Judicial Racism, in the granting, or refusal to grant Restraining Orders in the State of Virginia ?
Here is the email from the victim in this Virginia Restraining Order Case, reproduced in it's entirety, including her name! I offered to change or hide Laura's name, to protect her right to privacy. Laura felt so strongly that she did nothing wrong, and was a victim of blatant Racism from the judge in Virginia, she told me to go ahead and publish the email just the way she sent it!
Good Afternoon. My situation is as follows. My ex-husband who I left
> after he cheated on me with several drug addicts and drug dealers, and
> gave me Hepatitis B has taken out a Civil Protection Order against me
> in the State of Virginia. I live in Washington DC and have had no
> contact with my ex-husband in a year. When in court he admitted he
> didn't feel fear or that he was in any danger. He also admitted that I
> had not threatened him. Yet the Judge still granted him the order with
> no evidence and his admission in open court. I was told by several
> Washington DC lawyers that the reason for this is because I am an
> African American woman, college educated and attractive and he is a
> white male. These racial differences apparently settled the case upon
> the moment I entered the courtroom. He has taken out this CPO in order
> to extract revenge and prove to his current drug dealer girlfriend
> that he is "over" me.
>
> Laura Clifton
Restraining Order Blog is not meant to harass, directly or indirectly contact, harm, imtimidate, bring any emotional distress, stalk or cyberstalk, nor intentionally slander or damage any individual in any way. Nor is it intended to initiate any third party contact on behalf of any poster or author, or violate a current restraining order in any way. If you feel there is anything on our Restraining Order Blog that is slanderous, untrue, or illegal, please bring it to our attention. Our Restraining Order Blog Legal Staff will examine your request promptly, and any post you find offensive will be reviewed and possibly removed in a timely mannner
No comments:
Post a Comment